Arkansas Restorative Initiative

Across the U.S.

50 states. Different definitions. One word: recidivism.

A percentage doesn't explain itself. Before comparing two states, ask what event counted, who was measured, how long people were followed, and which release cohort produced the number.
Return to prison? Reconviction? Arrest? Jail return? New felony only? 2 years? 3 years?
The color shows the measure. It does not indicate that a state is performing well or poorly.
National Coverage 50 states

Every state is represented in the selected CSG comparison used by this explorer.

Measurement Families 13 methods

The selected state figures fall into thirteen different measurement categories on this page.

Release Cohorts 2016–2022

The figures do not come from one uniform release year. Cohort age is part of the comparison.

Comparison Updated May 12, 2026

The page keeps the CSG reporting period visible instead of presenting every state figure as a 2026 cohort.

Before you compare two states

Read what sits underneath the percentage.

Two states can publish similar percentages while measuring different events. Two states can also publish very different percentages while using different populations, time periods, or definitions.

The rate matters.
The definition tells you what the rate actually means.
Question 01

What event counts?

Return to state prison? Arrest? Reconviction? A new felony? A jail return? A supervision outcome?

Question 02

Who is in the cohort?

A state prison release cohort, a broader jail population, people under supervision, or another defined population?

Question 03

How long are they followed?

Most entries in this comparison use a three year window, while some states use a different follow up period.

Question 04

How old is the cohort?

The latest data available for one state may represent people released several years earlier than another state's cohort.

National data laboratory

Explore all 50 states.

Select a state to see the rate used in the comparison, release cohort, follow up period, population, qualifying event, technical violation treatment, and methodology note.

Color represents methodology. It does not represent a good or bad outcome. A lower percentage should not automatically be interpreted as stronger performance unless the underlying measures are comparable.
CSG comparison • figures available as of May 12, 2026
Loading the national map...
Do not turn this map into a ranking.

The colors show what each selected state measure counts. They do not show which state is “best.” A state counting new arrests is not measuring the same outcome as a state counting only a return to prison. Use the map to find the definition first, then compare rates only where the underlying measures are reasonably aligned.

Side by side

Compare the measurement first.

Choose any two states. The comparison below places the rate beside the cohort, follow up period, population, and event that actually generated it.

vs.
45% Arkansas • CSG selected measure

Arkansas in context

What does Arkansas's 45% actually mean?

In this comparison, Arkansas uses the 2019 release cohort and a three year state prison return measure. The selected measure counts reincarceration in state prison for any reason.

Release Cohort 2019
Follow Up 3 years
Population Annual state prison release cohort
Event Counted Reincarceration in state prison for any reason
Technical Violations Can count when the violation results in a return to state prison
What doesn't count by itself A stop, arrest, charge, or conviction without the qualifying prison return
ARI interpretation: Arkansas's 45% figure is useful because it tells us something specific: the selected CSG measure follows the 2019 state-prison release cohort for three years and counts a return to state prison for any reason. It does not tell us why the person returned, what happened during supervision, whether housing or treatment failed, or whether the return involved a new crime versus another qualifying pathway.

The same word • different measures

“Recidivism” can describe very different events.

The categories below represent the methodological variations used by states in the selected CSG comparison. They should be read as definitions, not as performance ratings.

How current is “latest”?

The states are not all built from the same release year.

The state entries used in this comparison span release cohorts from 2016 through 2022. That means the phrase “latest available” does not describe the same calendar year in every state.

Read before ranking

A lower number does not automatically mean a better system.

A state that counts only reincarceration for a new felony is measuring something narrower than a state that counts arrests, jail returns, supervision outcomes, or every return to state prison. Population, cohort year, correctional policy, and follow up period can also affect what appears in the rate.

Arkansas Restorative Initiative

The number is the beginning of the question.

Before using a recidivism percentage to compare states, evaluate policy, or describe correctional outcomes, ask what population was measured, what event counted, how long people were followed, and when the cohort actually left custody.

Arkansas Restorative Initiative

This page is designed to help readers interpret the state figures included in the Council of State Governments Justice Center comparison. Rates should be read together with the definition, release cohort, population, follow up period, and methodology associated with each state.

Arkansas Restorative Initiative

Who Is Qualified to Decide Parole?

Select a state to compare parole board qualifications, required professional backgrounds, hearing practices, and the biggest difference from Arkansas.

Read the colors carefully. This map does not rank whether a state is “good” or “bad.” It separates states by board requirements and identifies states where broad discretionary parole has been abolished or sharply restricted. Those states may still operate a board for older sentences, clemency, supervision, or limited release categories.

Click a state. Use Enter or Space with a keyboard.

Comparison framework current through July 2025
Loading the interactive map…